Nobody takes their trauma to zero — and Stoicism is a bit guilty of implying they can
Bartlett puts it to Brown that after hundreds of interviews he has concluded the fundamental stuff is never healed, and that this is good news given how many people are selling the promise that trauma and insecurity can be taken to zero. Brown agrees flatly and then turns the criticism on his own subject: even Stoicism, for all its talk of rolling with the punches, quietly implies that if you get it right you will not be disturbed and will not experience anxiety. He calls that a little bit off. The nature of life is that a lot of the time things really go badly, and certainly do not go as planned. The real task, he argues, is integrating the parts of ourselves we are uncomfortable with, not eliminating them.
- The fundamental stuff is never healed and never fully goes away
- Selling trauma-to-zero sets buyers up to blame themselves
- Stoicism carries a version of the same implicit promise
- The actual task is integration with the uncomfortable parts of yourself
- Aiming at a problem-free life is a terrible project because you will fail at it
“there's a lot of people that are trying to sell you on this that they can take your traumas or your your insecurities to zero.”
“it isn't about reaching a nirvana of of um a problem-free life. I think that's uh it's a really sort of terrible project cuz you're…”