TThe Diary of a CEO
← All frameworks
Leadership

The Leader Responsibility Loop

Trace organisational failures back to the system you can change

Difficulty
Advanced
Time to result
~ongoing to results
Steps
5
Confidence
96%

Responding to an allegation about inappropriate promotion questions, Watt says he was horrified both by the reported event and by his belief that leadership conditions made it possible. He contrasts his previous tendency to blame someone else with a later set of questions: what could he have done to prevent it, what should change, and how can the team and culture become stronger? The reusable mechanism traces an incident through leadership-controlled systems—hiring, tone, communication, management, reporting routes, resources, and incentives—then changes those systems to reduce recurrence. This is not a claim that a CEO personally caused every act, nor should it erase individual accountability. Immediate safety, independent fact-finding, due process, and legal obligations remain essential.

Origin

Watt describes the shift while responding to a reported BrewDog promotion interview in which an employee said she was repeatedly asked about children and marriage.

Core principles

  • 01Blaming one person can conceal the leadership system that enabled the failure
  • 02Leaders influence outcomes through hiring, expectations, communication, and controls
  • 03Responsibility should produce prevention rather than a performance of guilt
  • 04System accountability does not erase individual misconduct or due process

How to run it

  1. 1

    Name and contain the failure

    Describe what is alleged or known, distinguish the two, and protect people from continuing harm. Trigger independent, legal, HR, or safeguarding processes where required.

    Pro tip Use precise language about evidence and uncertainty.

    Watch out Leadership reflection must not replace a proper investigation.

  2. 2

    Reject the easy scapegoat

    Hold relevant individuals accountable through fair process while asking what organisational conditions enabled or failed to detect the behaviour. Avoid treating one dismissal as a complete fix.

    Watch out System causes do not excuse misconduct.

  3. 3

    Trace leadership inputs

    Review hiring, role clarity, training, targets, resources, management behaviour, reporting routes, and escalation controls. Identify where leadership choices shaped the environment.

    Pro tip Include evidence from people closest to the incident.

  4. 4

    Choose preventable causes

    Select the system conditions leadership can realistically change and prioritise those most connected to harm. State why each proposed change should reduce recurrence.

    Pro tip Prefer controls that change behaviour over statements that merely restate values.

  5. 5

    Implement and verify

    Assign each change to an owner, set a review date, and check whether reporting, behaviour, and employee experience improve. Reopen the analysis when the signal does not change.

    Pro tip Pair leading indicators, such as reporting confidence, with incident outcomes.

    Watch out A lower report count can mean less trust rather than fewer incidents.

In the wild

Responding to reported promotion questions

The host raised a report that a BrewDog employee had been repeatedly asked about children and marriage during a promotion process. Watt said the reported conduct should never have happened and argued that his own hiring, communication, or cultural leadership had to be examined alongside the incident.

He framed the leadership task as changing the conditions that allowed the reported behaviour, rather than only blaming another person.

Common mistakes

Making responsibility theatrical

Publicly accepting blame without changing systems, assigning owners, or checking results does not complete the loop.

Erasing individual accountability

A system review should accompany fair investigation of individual conduct, not replace it.

Treating fewer reports as success

Reporting can fall because employees trust the process less, so leaders need multiple indicators.

Is it for you?

Best for

Senior leaders reviewing harmful incidents, culture failures, or repeated operational problems within their organisations.

Not ideal for

Processes where immediate independent investigation, legal reporting, safeguarding, or individual accountability must take precedence.

From the transcript

i can never ever blame anyone but myself

James Watt · (1:17:00)

what could i have done to ensure that didn't happen

James Watt · (1:17:30)

From the episode

Brewdog Founder: The Untold Story Of One Britain’s Fastest Growing Companies: James Watt