TThe Diary of a CEO
← All frameworks
Communication

Relationship Language Interview

Replace assumptions about love and sex with explicit questions and mutual learning

Difficulty
Moderate
Time to result
~weeks to results
Steps
6
Confidence
98%

Brooke and Bartlett describe love and sex as languages that partners may speak differently. Instead of concluding that a partner does not want intimacy, the interview asks what each person means by it, how each likes to give and receive love, what feels good or unwelcome, what has changed, how much time is needed, and how arousal works for that individual. Brooke notes that some people will not yet know their answers, so self-inquiry may precede the shared conversation. The couple then chooses a small experiment and reviews it without turning the interaction into a performance or competition. The broader mechanism is mutual development: two different people build shared understanding through respectful communication rather than treating compatibility as a fixed binary discovered at the start of a relationship.

Origin

Brooke and Bartlett develop the language analogy on The Diary of a CEO while discussing how porn had shaped their earlier assumptions about sex.

Core principles

  • 01Partners may use the same word for different experiences
  • 02Giving and receiving preferences are not necessarily identical
  • 03Preferences can change over time and by context
  • 04Self-inquiry can come before a partner conversation
  • 05Respectful communication aims to understand rather than win

How to run it

  1. 1

    Define your own language

    Privately consider how you like to give and receive love or intimacy, including what you do not yet know.

    Pro tip Separate genuine preference from a script learned through family, partners, or pornography.

  2. 2

    Invite the interview

    Ask the other person for a calm conversation focused on understanding rather than proving that either partner is wrong.

    Pro tip Choose a time outside the immediate moment of conflict or intimacy.

  3. 3

    Ask giving and receiving questions

    Discuss how each person likes to receive care and how each naturally expresses it, rather than assuming the two match.

    Pro tip Use concrete examples from recent interactions.

  4. 4

    Map current preferences

    Ask about likes, dislikes, changed preferences, pace, time, and arousal while leaving room for uncertainty.

    Pro tip Treat 'I don't know yet' as usable information, not resistance.

    Watch out Every experiment still requires ongoing consent.

  5. 5

    Translate one difference

    Choose one mismatch and agree on a respectful way to try each other's language or create a shared one.

    Pro tip Start with a low-pressure change rather than redesigning the entire relationship.

  6. 6

    Review without winning

    Discuss what felt connecting, what did not, and what to adjust, with understanding as the goal.

    Pro tip Preferences can evolve, so repeat the interview rather than treating it as a one-time test.

In the wild

From rejection to translation

Bartlett says he initially heard a partner's statement that she did not like sex as rejection. After returning to the relationship and creating space for a conversation, he learned that her earlier experiences had made the word mean being treated as an object. He describes both partners then developing a different language together.

A fixed compatibility verdict became a conversation about meaning, safety, and shared development.

Common mistakes

Assuming your language is universal

A partner may reject the experience attached to a word rather than intimacy itself.

Turning intimacy into a performance

Brooke says fixed scripts and destination-driven sex left both partners performing rather than communicating.

Expecting instant answers

Some preferences need private reflection or gradual discovery before they can be explained clearly.

Is it for you?

Best for

Consenting adult partners who want to understand differing preferences and develop a more mutually satisfying relationship.

Not ideal for

Coercive, abusive, or unsafe relationships where better phrasing cannot create genuine consent or respect.

From the transcript

how do you like to receive love and how do you like to give love

Africa Brooke · (1:18:00)

what do you like and what do you not like

Africa Brooke · (1:18:30)

From the episode

Victimhood & Self-sabotage Is Destroying The World In 2022: Africa Brooke