Right-versus-Right-Now Disclosure Rule
Move sensitive truth through lawful review instead of forcing speed
- Difficulty
- Advanced
- Time to result
- ~months to results
- Steps
- 5
- Confidence
- 95%
Elizondo frames sensitive disclosure as a choice between doing something correctly and merely doing it immediately. He says he mapped the boundaries of his security oath, submitted his book to the Department of Defense pre-publication review process, waited nearly a year, retained visible redactions, and limited later answers to cleared material. The mechanism is procedural legitimacy: an authorized reviewer separates publishable information from protected sources, methods, and capabilities, allowing some public discussion without an unauthorized leak. The framework does not establish that every government review is fair or that cleared claims are true. It is a risk-control method for preserving legality and credibility while pursuing disclosure through recognized channels.
Origin
Luis Elizondo described the review and redaction process for his book Imminent on The Diary of a CEO.
Core principles
- 01Public interest does not erase lawful confidentiality duties
- 02Sensitive claims should pass an authorized review path
- 03Redaction can preserve disclosure while protecting sources and methods
- 04Credibility depends on staying inside explicit legal boundaries
- 05Speed is not worth an irreversible unauthorized disclosure
How to run it
- 1
Map the boundary
Identify the oath, agreement, law, classification rule, or confidentiality duty governing the material. Distinguish what you know from what you are authorized to disclose.
Pro tip Get qualified advice when the boundary is unclear.
Watch out Personal certainty that disclosure is justified is not legal authorization.
- 2
Find the authorized channel
Use the applicable pre-publication, legal, compliance, oversight, or protected-reporting process. Confirm that the channel covers the exact material and intended audience.
Watch out An informal conversation with a colleague is not a substitute for formal clearance.
- 3
Submit exact language
Provide the actual text, images, or claims intended for release so reviewers can assess the real disclosure rather than a vague summary.
Pro tip Preserve a clear record of submissions and decisions.
- 4
Respect protected details
Remove or redact information the authorized process determines remains protected, especially sources, methods, locations, and collection capabilities.
Pro tip Visible redactions can show that limits exist without revealing their contents.
Watch out Clearance to discuss one statement does not authorize adjacent classified detail.
- 5
Stay within clearance
When questioned after publication, answer only inside the reviewed boundary and say when you cannot elaborate. Treat the cleared record as the limit, not the opening bid.
Watch out Pressure for immediate disclosure can tempt gradual boundary creep.
In the wild
Elizondo says his manuscript spent almost a year in Department of Defense pre-publication review and emerged with portions redacted. During the interview he repeatedly declines to go beyond what that process allowed him to publish.
→ He discusses cleared claims publicly while maintaining that he has not leaked classified information.
Common mistakes
Treating urgency as permission
A strong public-interest argument does not automatically remove legal or contractual disclosure limits.
Expanding beyond reviewed wording
Approval of a publication does not necessarily clear every related detail for spontaneous discussion.
Is it for you?
Best for
Former officials, researchers, or employees handling information governed by security, confidentiality, or pre-publication review obligations.
Not ideal for
Immediate emergencies where an authorized urgent-reporting or protected whistleblower channel is available and delay would create direct harm.
From the transcript
“There's a right way and a wrong way to do things.”
“There's a difference between doing things right and doing things right now.”
From the episode
Ex-Pentagon Official: The U.S Isn't Telling The Truth! Top-Secret UFO Encounters Finally Uncovered! They're Trying To Silence Us!