Digital Life Is Not Automatically Good or Bad for Mental Health
Peters resists a universal verdict on digital convenience, remote work, and social media. He argues that effects depend on individual needs and use: many people need social interaction, while public criticism can be destructive for some and online connection useful for others.
- He emphasizes individual variation rather than a single digital-health rule
- He says many people are socially oriented and may struggle if isolation goes uncompensated
- He describes public criticism as potentially harmful
- His practical question is whether the person's needs are understood and met
“We're all on a spectrum”
“it's how we interact with it and learn what works for us as individuals”