TThe Diary of a CEO
← All frameworks
Innovation

Values-Bounded Innovation Test

Adopt change only when it extends the promise without compromising it

Difficulty
Moderate
Time to result
~weeks to results
Steps
5
Confidence
98%

Eckbert distinguishes Five Guys' value of serving a strong burger experience from its former rule against delivery. The founders had a sound concern: burgers and fries taste best immediately after cooking. The UK team argued that customers increasingly wanted high-quality delivered food and that a delivery partner could protect the product in transit. They tested the channel, supplied practical reheating guidance, and found that customers accepted it; delivery reached roughly a fifth of UK sales before becoming especially important during the pandemic. The method separates ends from means. Preserve the non-negotiable customer promise, identify the risk introduced by a new channel, add safeguards, and test whether the promise survives in practice. Change is accepted because evidence shows compatibility with the value, not because novelty is automatically good.

Origin

Extracted from The Diary of a CEO. John Eckbert uses Five Guys' UK delivery launch to show how a former brand rule could change while the underlying commitment to product quality remained.

Core principles

  • 01A historical rule is not necessarily a core value
  • 02Innovation should preserve the customer promise
  • 03A bounded market test is stronger than abstract debate
  • 04Operational partners affect whether a new channel protects quality

How to run it

  1. 1

    Name the Protected Value

    Describe the customer outcome that must survive any change. Distinguish it from the current process used to deliver it.

    Pro tip Phrase the value from the customer's perspective.

  2. 2

    Expose the Real Risk

    Identify exactly how the proposed innovation could weaken that outcome. Avoid defending a historical rule without naming the harm it prevents.

    Pro tip Specify where quality could degrade between production and use.

  3. 3

    Build Safeguards

    Choose processes, partners, and customer guidance that reduce the identified risk. Make those protections part of the test rather than optional follow-up.

    Pro tip Assign ownership for each vulnerable handoff.

    Watch out A partner's convenience does not prove they can protect the experience.

  4. 4

    Run a Bounded Test

    Launch on a controlled scale and observe customer demand, quality, and operational effects. Compare the result with the protected value.

    Pro tip Collect direct feedback on the compromised part of the experience.

  5. 5

    Decide on Evidence

    Scale when the new method extends access while keeping the promise acceptably intact. Reject or redesign it when the test reveals material compromise.

    Pro tip Record which former rule changed and which value did not.

    Watch out Commercial uptake alone does not show that brand quality survived.

In the wild

The UK Team Tests Delivery

Five Guys' founders had resisted delivery because the food was best directly from the grill. Eckbert says the UK team worked with delivery partners, gave customers guidance for reviving fries, and demonstrated that delivered food could remain a good experience.

Delivery became a substantial UK sales channel and was already available when pandemic restrictions arrived.

A Live Course Tests Recorded Access

Illustrative example: a workshop business values instructor feedback but has always required live attendance. It pilots recordings with scheduled feedback sessions, measuring completion and learner outcomes before deciding whether asynchronous access preserves the promise.

The company can evaluate wider distribution without silently removing the feedback that defines the offer.

Common mistakes

Confusing a Rule With a Value

A process may be historical and still changeable even when the customer promise behind it remains essential.

Changing Without Safeguards

The delivery example depended on transport care and customer guidance rather than channel adoption alone.

Using Revenue as the Only Test

A channel can sell while still degrading the experience the brand intends to protect.

Is it for you?

Best for

It is best for organisations considering a new channel, technology, or process that challenges a long-standing operating rule.

Not ideal for

It is not ideal when the proposed change directly violates the core promise or cannot be tested without disproportionate harm.

From the transcript

our burgers and fries taste best right off the grill

John Eckbert · (23:30)

it can work

John Eckbert · (24:00)

it doesn't compromise on their values

John Eckbert · (25:30)

From the episode

Building A Business Empire WITHOUT ANY Marketing: Five Guys CEO: John Eckbert